[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4768555A.3000604@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:18:50 -0500
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, prasanna@...ibm.com,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
systemtap-ml <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: fix kprobe_handler reenable preemption
Fix a preemption bug in kprobe_handler(). It has to call preempt_enable()
before returning.
I think this is critical on preemptive kernel.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c 2007-12-18 12:51:00.000000000 -0500
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c 2007-12-18 12:53:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -467,7 +467,8 @@
arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
regs->ip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
reset_current_kprobe();
- return 1;
+ ret = 1;
+ goto no_kprobe;
#endif
}
/* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since
@@ -481,7 +482,7 @@
kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_REENTER;
- return 1;
+ ret = 1;
} else {
if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
/* The breakpoint instruction was removed by
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists