linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc5-mm 3/3] gpiolib: obsolete drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f17812d70712171754q3b71a39dl7d17f5d9e5b8014c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:54:42 +0800
From:	"eric miao" <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To:	"Jean Delvare" <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	"David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, i2c@...sensors.org,
	bgardner@...tec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc5-mm 3/3] gpiolib: obsolete drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c

Well, I guess it would be a smooth path if we rename the
drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c
since that's old style I2C driver, which means the driver name is not
so useful external
so the impact is actually minimum.


On Dec 18, 2007 4:29 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:09:53 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:33:27 +0800
> > > From: "eric miao" <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
> > >
> > > for the following reasons:
> > >
> > > 1. there is currently no known users of this driver
> > >
> > > 2. the functionality of this driver is well supported with the recent
> > >    proposed drivers/gpio/pca9539.c, using GPIO_LIB
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: eric miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>
> > > Acked-by: Ben Gardner <bgardner@...tec.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/i2c/chips/pca9539 |   47 --------
> > >  drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig       |   10 --
> > >  drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile      |    1 -
> > >  drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c     |  196 ----------------------------------
> >
> > Jean, do you sign off on this?  In any case I think this should
> > be going through your I2C patches.
> >
> > I'd be a trifle uneasy just deleting this, because it's possible
> > there are *unknown* users ... and also because nobody's yet done
> > a userspace interface to the gpiolib infrastructure.  (It seems
> > to be the usual case of nobody wanting such a thing quite enough
> > to write the code.)
> >
> > I'd be more comfortable marking it as obsolete and flagging it
> > for removal a release or two after Eric's new version merges ...
> > though maybe that's just paranoia.
>
> I'm fine with this and I agree that it would be safer, however please
> note that both drivers are mutually exclusive because they have the
> same name, meaning that deprecating the old driver is not enough, you
> also need Kconfig magic to make sure that both drivers aren't built at
> the same time. Or alternatively the old driver could be renamed... I
> don't really care myself, I'll take whatever patch you or Eric submit.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
>



-- 
Cheers
- eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/