linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] 2.6.24-rcx: Make sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <47685F4B.8000207@shaw.ca>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:01:15 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To:	Karsten Wiese <fzu@...gehoertderstaat.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] 2.6.24-rcx: Make sys_poll() wait at least timeout ms

Karsten Wiese wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> while playing with jackd on 2.6.24-rcx, I found poll() timing out too early.
> That is: earlier than its timeout argument specified.
> Setting poll()'s timeout argument to "required timeout" + "1 jiffy in ms"
> fixed it. Patch below should fix it too. Correct?
> Untested.
> Otherwise 2.6.24-rc5 ticks just fine here, thanks.
> 
>       Karsten
>  
> ------------->
> Make sys_poll() wait at least timeout ms
> 
> schedule_timeout(jiffies) waits for at least jiffies - 1.
> Add 1 jiffie to the timeout_jiffies calculated in sys_poll() to wait at least
> timeout_msecs, like poll() manpage says.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karsten Wiese <fzu@...gehoertderstaat.de>
> ---
>  fs/select.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
> index 47f4792..5633fe9 100644
> --- a/fs/select.c
> +++ b/fs/select.c
> @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_poll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
>  			timeout_jiffies = -1;
>  		else
>  #endif
> -			timeout_jiffies = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_msecs);
> +			timeout_jiffies = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_msecs) + 1;
>  	} else {
>  		/* Infinite (< 0) or no (0) timeout */
>  		timeout_jiffies = timeout_msecs;

That seems fishy. What is your value of HZ and what is the timeout value 
that was passed in the bad case?

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/