[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfb262380712190843jf432d42vd6564afe5b5b9f6c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:43:08 +0200
From: "Ramagudi Naziir" <naziirr@...il.com>
To: "Jason Wessel" <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc: "Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: a problem with NETPOLL/KGDBoE
On 12/19/07, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com> wrote:
> What module parameters did you pass to kgdboe and what kernel are you
> using and are you using the kgdb source forge patches?
I am running the kgdb_2.6.23 branch of your kgdb git tree
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwessel/linux-2.6-kgdb.git).
my kgdb parameter is "6443@...0.0.28/,32323@...0.0.11/",
where 10.0.0.28 is my target and 10.0.0.11 is the host running gdb.
I have to sniff gdb in order to find out the value of 32323...
> I had not looked to see if anything changed in the latest net poll api,
> but previously with the 2.6.21 kernel as example, the net poll api
> ignored the source port parameter entirely. If this has changed, I
I don't know about 2.6.21, but now it seems that NETPOLL do not
ignore the source port.
> would be happy to make a further change to zero out the port or do what
> is needed to make it dynamic again, in a similar fashion to the way the
> MAC address parsing is dynamic for KGDB + the net poll api.
Oh that would be great.
Thanks,
naziir
>
> Jason.
>
> Also you can omit the linux-kernel mailling and take this up at:
> kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net if you are using the source forge
> patches.
I didn't find source forge patches that are still applicable to nowadays
kernels, so I am using your git tree.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists