linux-kernel - Re: Trying to convert old modules to newer kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712192215340.5524@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:16:19 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	"linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>
cc:	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Trying to convert old modules to newer kernels


On Dec 19 2007 16:10, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
>> I anticipate the day removing __init causes a breakage, heh.
>> I mean, if all in-tree modules and LDD3 use it, it can't be wrong, can it?
>>
>>> plus got rid of all the code!
>>> static int32_t startup()
>>
>> I noticed that. Where's your "void" gone? :-)
>
>What void???
>

static __init int startup(void)
{
	...
}

Just a stylistic thing, but it has got a clear semantic difference to ().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/