[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071219034033.GA5770@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:40:33 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Inline local_bh_disable when TRACE_IRQFLAGS
Hi Ingo:
I noticed that local_bh_disable is now always out-of-line. The
change was made when TRACE_IRQFLAGS was added. However, with
TRACE_IRQFLAGS off, local_bh_disable does exactly the same work
as before. In particular, it does pretty much the same as what
preempt_disable does and the latter is always inline.
So I'm wondering if it would be reasonable to make it out-of-line
when TRACE_IRQFLAGS is off. This may make a difference because
the networking stack is a frequent user of local_bh_disable and
local_bh_enable.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists