linux-kernel - Re: [patch 10/20] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:17:53 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.shermerhorn@...com
Subject: Re: [patch 10/20] SEQ replacement for anonymous pages

Hi Rik-san,

> To keep the maximum amount of necessary work reasonable, we scale the
> active to inactive ratio with the size of memory, using the formula
> active:inactive ratio = sqrt(memory in GB * 10).

Great.

why do you think best formula is sqrt(GB*10)?
please tell me if you don't mind.

and i have a bit worry to it works well or not on small systems.
because it is indicate 1:1 ratio on less than 100MB memory system.
Do you think this viewpoint?


/kosaki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/