[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071219055550.GE21042@denkbrett.schottelius.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:55:50 +0100
From: Nico Schottelius <nico-kernel-20071219@...ottelius.org>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Out of memory and no killable processes: 2.6.22-2-686-bigmem
Hello Robert,
Robert Hancock [Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:43:22PM -0600]:
> How much RAM is in these machines?
8 GiB
> If you're running tons of memory, it
> really is better to run a 64-bit kernel if possible.
Sure? Afaik that results in a bit slower access to memory and appart
from being able to address MUCH more memory doesn't change the
situation.
Perhaps I missed something.
And updating to 64 Bit kernel also implies changing the userland, so
a reinstall would be necessary, wouldn't it?
> I believe there are
> some cases where low memory can be pretty easily exhausted on machines with
> lots of high memory.
Some minutes ago the third machine of that type freezed.
with 7 GiB of *free* memory, before getting oom+panic.
The thing that looks pretty the same is that the inode table / open
inodes shrinked very heavy from 41k to about 2k before the freeze
in about 3 days.
Same kernel, same Dell 1955 hardware, different machine.
Is it possible to debug this issue somehow?
Nico
--
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/
PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42 F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists