[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712201853.48643.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:53:48 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, dougg@...que.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sg_ring for scsi
On Thursday 20 December 2007 18:07:41 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:45:18 +1100
>
> Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> > OK, some fixes since last time, as I wade through more SCSI drivers.
> > Some drivers use "use_sg" as a flag to know whether the request_buffer is
> > a scatterlist: I don't need the counter, but I still need the flag, so I
> > fixed that in a more intuitive way (an explicit ->sg pointer in the cmd).
>
> use_sg and the request_buffer will be removed shortly.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=119754650614813&w=2
Thanks! Is there a git tree somewhere with these changes?
> I think that we tried the similar idea before, scsi_sgtable, but we
> seem to settle in the current simple approach.
Yes, a scsi-specific solution is a bad idea: other people use sg.
Manipulating the magic chains is horrible; it looks simple to the places
which simply want to iterate through it, but it's awful for code which wants
to create them.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists