[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476A5EAF.6020008@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:23:11 -0500
From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@...hat.com>
To: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF]
To all,
The next few forwarded messages comprise my responses to Greg's
questions about the patch I submitted to deal with pci devices
that do not respond correctly to x86 mmconf accesses.
Please accept my apologies for not having including the community
in my original responses.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:58:45 -0500
From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@...hat.com>
Reply-To: tcamuso@...hat.com
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
References:
<20071219221746.20362.39243.sendpatchset@...p83-188.boston.redhat.com>
<20071219221751.20362.23451.sendpatchset@...p83-188.boston.redhat.com>
<20071219230447.GA24219@...e.de>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:17:51PM -0500, tcamuso@...hat.com wrote:
>>
>> +extern struct pci_ops pci_legacy_ops; /* direct.c */
>
> This isn't needed in this patch at all, and might make the compiler
> confused if you were to build with only this patch present :(
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Yes, of course. I missed that. Thank you.
Should I resubmit that one patch? Or would you prefer I resubmit
the whole patch set?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists