[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712201418.17378.jbe@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:18:16 +0100
From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@...gutronix.de>
To: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinuxrt@...il.com>,
"Remy Bohmer" <linux@...mer.net>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Darren Hart" <dvhltc@...ibm.com>,
"Sven-Thorsten Dietrich" <sdietrich@...ell.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] Enable setting of IRQ-thread priorities from kernel cmdline. (repost:CC to LKML)
On Thursday 20 December 2007 13:45, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> On 12/20/07, Remy Bohmer <linux@...mer.net> wrote:
> > So, Is this a serious requirement? Should this be possible?
>
> I have noticed this problem:
> root@....168.1.253:~# cat /proc/loadavgrt
> 1.00 1.00 1.00 0/52 1158
> root@....168.1.253:~# cat /proc/loadavg
> 0.00 0.00 0.02 1/52 1159
> root@....168.1.253:~#
>
> So I am curious, if possible, user can switch softirq-threads or IRQs
> RT tasks to non-RT tasks for slow hardware or least important hardware
> for NON-RT tasks. So this will improve RT behaviour.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Why?
IMHO: Simply decrease the RT priority of less important IRQs or increase all
other more important IRQs. IRQs are always more important than other
processes in a system, also in non RT systems.
Juergen
--
Dipl.-Ing. Juergen Beisert | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany
Phone: +49-8766-939 228 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists