[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476ABE60.9030805@opengridcomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:11:28 -0600
From: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bherren@....ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
OpenFabrics General <general@...ts.openfabrics.org>,
Wen Xiong <wenxiong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] iommu dma mapping alignment requirements
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > It appears that my problem boils down to a single host page of memory
> > that is mapped for dma, and the dma address returned by dma_map_sg()
> > is _not_ 64KB aligned. Here is an example:
>
> > My first question is: Is there an assumption or requirement in linux
> > that dma_addressess should have the same alignment as the host address
> > they are mapped to? IE the rdma core is mapping the entire 64KB page,
> > but the mapping doesn't begin on a 64KB page boundary.
>
> I don't think this is explicitly documented anywhere, but it certainly
> seems that we want the bus address to be page-aligned in this case.
> For mthca/mlx4 at least, we tell the adapter what the host page size
> is (so that it knows how to align doorbell pages etc) and I think this
> sort of thing would confuse the HW.
>
> - R.
In arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c:iommu_map_sg() I see that it calls
iommu_range_alloc() with a alignment_order of 0:
> vaddr = (unsigned long)page_address(s->page) + s->offset;
> npages = iommu_num_pages(vaddr, slen);
> entry = iommu_range_alloc(tbl, npages, &handle, mask >> IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
But perhaps the alignment order needs to be based on the host page size?
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists