linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <476AC59B.1090702@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:42:19 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	parag.warudkar@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog

Kok, Auke wrote:

> ok, that's just bad and if there's no user-defineable limit to the deferral I
> definately don't like this change.
> 
> Can I safely assume that any irq will cause all deferred timers to run?

*on that cpu*. Timers are per cpu, as are interrupts. Just not per se the same one ...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/