[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476B335C.5080905@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:30:36 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch 14/24] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> Argh.. Rusty asked to have a simplified version first, and then to
> implement the "more complex" one on top of it. However, in order to get
> the reentrancy I need for the markers, I need the complex version of the
> immediate values. Therefore, you find, in this patchset, the simple
> version first, and then, the more complex one implemented on top.
>
> About this patch header, the initial idea was to use the "Q" and "R"
> constraints, but, as stated just below, the "q" and "r" constraints are
> used instead to make sure the REX prefixed opcodes for 1, 2, and 4 bytes
> immediate values are never used. So the complete header follows the
> source code, it's just that this paragraph could be clearer.
>
Then you have it backwards. "Q" and "R" avoid REX prefixes, "q" and "r"
DO NOT.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists