[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071221101911.GA22452@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:19:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc5 x86 architecture no longer Oopses...
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > btw, I think we should track this as a regression, please.
>
> Added, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9610, thanks.
fixed by:
commit c0a698b7443a9fce76b0a849f06c45ac78f3b0a0
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Fri Dec 21 01:27:19 2007 +0100
x86: fix die() to not be preemptible
Andrew "Eagle Eye" Morton noticed that we use raw_local_save_flags()
instead of raw_local_irq_save(flags) in die(). This allows the
preemption of oopsing contexts - which is highly undesirable. It also
causes CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT to complain, as reported by Miles Lane.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists