[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712211254160.21721@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:55:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, joe@...ches.com,
davem@...emloft.net, apw@...dowen.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, elendil@...net.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
trivial@...nel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, jschopp@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
On Dec 21 2007 19:41, Herbert Xu wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 11:10:38AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> > [XFS] Initialise current offset in xfs_file_readdir correctly
>> >
>> >The reason is that it lacks a subject.
>>
>> "current offset" is your subject.
>
>In my school we were taught that "current offset" is part of the
>predicate as opposed to the subject. This can be seen from the
>fact that "offset" is singular while "initialise" did not take
>on its third-person singular form of "initialises".
o_O I better continue believing it is the subject. Because with
one extra word at the front, you can make this a "complete sentence":
Please initialize [the] current offset in xfs_file_readdir.
;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists