linux-kernel - Re: Top 10 kernel oopses/warnings for the week of December 21st 2007

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <p73ejdgf8vj.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:57:36 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Top 10 kernel oopses/warnings for the week of December 21st 2007

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> writes:

> 	
> Rank 8: __change_page_attr
> 	BUG at arch/x86/mm/pageattr_64.c:176
> 	Reported 2 times
> 	Reported this week for 2.6.24-rc5; history goes back to 2.6.15

There is no BUG on this line on 2.6.24-rc5.   Since there are many
BUG_ONs in this file it is unclear which you mean.

Could you always include the version of the kernel where the actual
oops in the line came from?

Anyways there are a lot of third party modules who do strange 
things with c_p_a(), not always legal, so you might look up out for that 
pattern too. Perhaps report the out of tree modules loaded in the 
summary too?

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/