linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: another attempt at x86 pagetable unification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:03:36 -0200
From:	"Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] x86: another attempt at x86 pagetable unification

On Dec 20, 2007 10:58 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
> > Well, testing for bisectability requires compiling each patch as its
> > applied, which gets painful for something like this where any change
> > will rebuild the world.  And dealing with patch conflicts caused by
> > changing early patches in the series is never fun.
>
> that's true. The 'rej' tool helps alot though. ( Plus a distcc cluster
> that builds a distro kernel in 45-50 seconds from scratch ;)


So that's your secret!


-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/