[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1198275391.30889.3.camel@lappy>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:16:30 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:11 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > If you aren't even motivated to fix the problems that have been reported,
> > then SLUB isn't even a _potential_ solution, it's purely a problem, and
> > since I am not IN THE LEAST interested in having three different
> > allocators around, SLUB is going to get axed.
>
> Not motivated? I have analyzed the problem in detail and when it comes
> down to it there is not much impact that I can see in real life
> applications. I have always responded to the regression reported also via
> TPC-C.
But you are dismissing the hackbench regression, which is not a small
one. It runs an astonishing 10x slower.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists