| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:20:08 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: mingo@...e.hu Cc: clameter@....com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org, rjw@...k.pl Subject: Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers) From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:54:13 +0100 > Really, if your behavior is representative of how our SLAB allocator > will be maintained in the future then i'm very, very worried :-( Actually, to the contrary, I actually think Christoph responds to every problem I've ever reported to him about his per-cpu counters work and SLUB much better than most people who call themselves "maintainers" around here. And I say that without any reservations. He doesn't deserve the ad-hominem attacks he is getting today, because he does resolve every problem reported to him. The guy wrote test cases, he analyzed every problem, he wrote test patches, and he doesn't stop doing any of that until the issue really is reported as resolved by the testers. I'll take Christoph as the implementor and maintainer of anything, any day of the week. He rocks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists