[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712210243.35240.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:43:33 +0100
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
trivial@...nel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
On Thursday 20 December 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> The kernel printk messages are sentences.
I'm afraid that I completely and utterly disagree. Kernel messages are _not_
sentences. The vast majority is not well-formed and does not contain any of
the elements that are required for a proper sentence.
The most kernel messages can be compared to is a rather diverse and sloppy
enumeration. And enumerations follow completely different rules than
sentences. It can better be characterized as a "semi-random sequence of
context-sensitive technical messages".
IMHO the existing rule that "Kernel messages do not have to be terminated
with a period." is completely justified, though it does need some minor
clarification on the cases in which proper punctuation _should_ be
followed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists