[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071221023031.GA23320@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:30:31 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Jan Beulich] [PATCH] constify tables in kernel/sysctl_check.c
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:14:05PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Remains the question whether it is intended that many, perhaps even
> large, tables are compiled in without ever having a chance to get used,
> i.e. whether there shouldn't #ifdef CONFIG_xxx get added.
> -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_param_table[] = {
> +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
we lost the _param, which will cause a duplicate definition with ..
> -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
> +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
cut-n-paste thinko ?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists