[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1J5VYf-0004go-9q@be1.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:16:09 +0100
From: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Trying to convert old modules to newer kernels
linux-os (Dick Johnson) <linux-os@...logic.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> It never gets to the printk(). You were right about the
>>> compilation. Somebody changed the kernel to compile with
>>> parameter passing in REGISTERS! This means that EVERYTHING
>>> needs to be compiled the same way, 'C' calling conventions
>>> were not good enough!
>>
>> How did you build the module. It reads like you failed to use
>> kbuild to build your module which is why you did not pass
>> correct options to gcc - correct?
>>
>> If you did not use kbuild - why not?
>> Is there anything missing you need?
> I need to get rid of -mregparm=3 on gcc's command line. It
> is completely incompatible with the standard calling conventions
> used in all our assembly-language files in our drivers. We make
> very high-speed number-crunching drivers that munge high-speed
> data into images. We need to do that in assembly as we have
> always done.
According to my quick googling, "__attribute__((regparm,0))" is what you need.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists