linux-kernel - Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020712220451s87a3957i1f1c64a60c6a8473@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:51:47 +0200
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)

Hi,

On Dec 22, 2007 2:37 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Removing an interface that exposes lots of internal details when you
> rewrite the subsystem and those internal details all change seems
> like a good reason to me.

Yeah but then again removing an interface that has been around for
ever is a real PITA for users. Besides, emulating /proc/slabinfo ain't
so bad:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/22/58

                                Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/