[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071222205432.GA2221@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:54:32 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Richard D <richard@...unus.com>,
'Matthew Bloch' <matthew@...emark.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing RAM from userspace / question about memmap= arguments
On Sun 2007-12-23 07:06:58, David Newall wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>> memtest has following problems:
>>
>> 0) it is kind of hard to run memtest over ssh
>>
>
> It's kind of hard to run anything over SSH if it has to be run before
> userspace is up. But the kernel can collect results from a modified
> memtest, after it chains back.
memtest can be ran from userspace, that's the point.
>> 1) if linux fixes some problem with PCI quirk or microcode
>> upload, memtest will not see the fix
>>
>
> What are you saying? Linux is going to fix faulty RAM?
Yes, that's what CPU microcode update is for. And I want to test my
RAM with up-to-date microcode.
>> 2) if memory only fails while something else happens (DMA to
>> other piece of memory? Hard disk load glitching powre
>> supply?), memtest will not see the problem.
>
> These are not RAM faults. The very last thing you want is evidence that
> you've got a faulty piece of RAM when the fault is actually a hard disk
> glitch!
No, it may be power supply leading to RAM problems. Yes, I want to
detect that.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists