[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476C6D06.2070301@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:48:54 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: devzero@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt.Domsch@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD
Andi Kleen wrote:
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
>
>> devzero@....de wrote:
>>> /* Query EDD information */
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_EDD) || defined(CONFIG_EDD_MODULE)
>>> - query_edd();
>>> + printf("Probing EDD (query Bios for boot-device information)\n");
>>> + printf("If boot hangs here, you may have a buggy Bios. Try edd=skipmbr or edd=off");
>>> + query_edd();
>>> + printf("\rOK \n");
>>> #endif
>> This is awfully verbose.
>
> But useful. On the other hand we have lots of IMNSHO
> quite useless printks in early bootup that could be removed
> to make up for that
>
> (e.g. candidates would be the
> "CPU: After/before generic identify"
> or
> Entering add_active_range....)
>
> printks and you can easily make up for the added verbosity.
>
Those don't live in an area of memory which is hard-limited to 32K.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists