[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071221222428.a75a5a34.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:24:28 -0800
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...mer.net,
jonathan@...masters.org, matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com,
kjwinchester@...il.com, zaitcev@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] usb: libusual: locking cleanup
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:00:04 -0800, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> I converted the usu_init_notify semaphore to normal mutex usage, and it
> should still prevent the request_module before the init routine is
> complete. Before it acted more like a complete, now the mutex protects
> two distinct section from running at the same time..
Let's see.
> @@ -178,10 +179,7 @@ static int usu_probe_thread(void *arg)
> int rc;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - /* A completion does not work here because it's counted. */
> - down(&usu_init_notify);
> - up(&usu_init_notify);
> -
> + mutex_lock(&usu_probe_mutex);
> rc = request_module(bias_names[type]);
When I tried it, usb-storage would not load with unresolved symbols.
It happens if child (usu_probe_thread) runs ahead of its parent
(usb_usual_init -> usb_register -> usu_probe). It's entirely possible,
depending on your scheduler.
I hate this down-up trick too, so if you have a better idea, I'm all ears.
-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists