Message-ID: <476CBD9B.9070203@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:02:43 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Memory controller remove control_type feature

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:23:58 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Based on the discussion at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/383, it was
>> felt that control_type might not be a good thing to implement right away.
>> We can add this flexibility at a later point when required.
> 
> Gee the memory controller patchset is turning into a mess.
> 

Yes, the patchset has expanded and we have several useful bug fixes and
cleanups and some new features.

> memory-controller-add-documentation.patch
> memcgroup-temporarily-revert-swapoff-mod.patch
> memory-controller-resource-counters-v7.patch
> memory-controller-containers-setup-v7.patch
> memory-controller-accounting-setup-v7.patch
> memory-controller-memory-accounting-v7.patch
> memory-controller-memory-accounting-v7-move-page_assign_page_cgroup-to-vm_bug_on-in-free_hot_cold_page.patch
> memory-controller-task-migration-v7.patch
> memory-controller-add-per-container-lru-and-reclaim-v7.patch
> memory-controller-add-per-container-lru-and-reclaim-v7-memcgroup-fix-try_to_free-order.patch
> memory-controller-improve-user-interface.patch
> memory-controller-improve-user-interface-memory-controller-enhancements-for-reclaiming-take2-possible-race-fix-in-res_counter.patch
> memory-controller-oom-handling-v7.patch
> memory-controller-add-switch-to-control-what-type-of-pages-to-limit-v7.patch
> memory-controller-make-page_referenced-container-aware-v7.patch
> memory-controller-make-charging-gfp-mask-aware.patch
> memory-controller-make-charging-gfp-mask-aware-fix.patch
> memcgroup-reinstate-swapoff-mod.patch
> memory-controller-bug_on.patch
> mem-controller-gfp-mask-fix.patch
> memcontrol-move-mm_cgroup-to-header-file.patch
> memcontrol-move-oom-task-exclusion-to-tasklist.patch
> oom-add-sysctl-to-enable-task-memory-dump.patch
> kswapd-should-only-wait-on-io-if-there-is-io.patch
> bugfix-for-memory-cgroup-controller-charge-refcnt-race-fix.patch
> bugfix-for-memory-cgroup-controller-fix-error-handling-path-in-mem_charge_cgroup.patch
> bugfix-for-memory-controller-add-helper-function-for-assigning-cgroup-to-page.patch
> bugfix-for-memory-cgroup-controller-avoid-pagelru-page-in-mem_cgroup_isolate_pages.patch
> bugfix-for-memory-cgroup-controller-avoid-pagelru-page-in-mem_cgroup_isolate_pages-fix.patch
> memcgroup-fix-zone-isolation-oom.patch
> memcgroup-revert-swap_state-mods.patch
> bugfix-for-memory-cgroup-controller-migration-under-memory-controller-fix.patch
> #
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-fix-zone-handling-in-try_to_free_mem_cgroup_page.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-fix-zone-handling-in-try_to_free_mem_cgroup_page-warning-fix.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-force_empty-interface-for-dropping-all-account-in-empty-cgroup.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-remember-a-page-is-charged-as-page-cache.patch
> memory-controller-use-rcu_read_lock-in-mem_cgroup_cache_charge.patch
> memcgroup-tidy-up-mem_cgroup_charge_common.patch
> memcgroup-fix-hang-with-shmem-tmpfs.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-remember-a-page-is-on-active-list-of-cgroup-or-not.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-status-accounting-function-for-memory-cgroup.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-status-accounting-function-for-memory-cgroup-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-status-accounting-function-for-memory-cgroup-fix-1.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-status-accounting-function-for-memory-cgroup-uninlining.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-status-accounting-function-for-memory-cgroup-fix-2.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-memorystat-file.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-memorystat-file-checkpatch-fixes.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-memorystat-file-printk-fix.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-add-pre_destroy-handler.patch
> memory-cgroup-enhancements-implicit-force_empty-at-rmdir.patch
> #
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-add-scan_global_lru-macro.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-nid-zid-helper-function-for-cgroup.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-per-zone-active-inactive-counter.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-per-zone-active-inactive-counter-memory-controller-enhancements-for-reclaiming-take2-clean-up-remove-unused-variable.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-per-zone-active-inactive-counter-memory-controller-enhancements-for-reclaiming-take2-add-bug_on-in-mem_cgroup_zoneinfo.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-calculate-mapper_ratio-per-cgroup.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-calculate-active-inactive-imbalance-per-cgroup.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-remember-reclaim-priority-in-memory-cgroup.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-remember-reclaim-priority-in-memory-cgroup-fix.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-remember-reclaim-priority-in-memory-cgroup-fix-2.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-calculate-the-number-of-pages-to-be-scanned-per-cgroup.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-modifies-vmscanc-for-isolate-globa-cgroup-lru-activity.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-modifies-vmscanc-for-isolate-globa-cgroup-lru-activity-fix.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-modifies-vmscanc-for-isolate-globa-cgroup-lru-activity-fix-accounting-in-vmscanc-for-memory-controller.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-per-zone-lru-for-cgroup.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-per-zone-lru-for-cgroup-bugfix-for-memory-cgroup-per-zone-struct-allocation.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-per-zone-lru-for-cgroup-memory-controller-enhancements-for-reclaiming-take2-define-free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info.patch
> per-zone-and-reclaim-enhancements-for-memory-controller-take-3-per-zone-lock-for-cgroup.patch
> memory-controller-remove-control_type-feature.patch
> update-documentation-controller-memorytxt.patch
> 
> Hopefully it'll look a bit better once I do a big patch-folding but we
> still have patches interesecting everywhere and now we have patches which
> add a feature and later ones which take it away again.
> 

I think folding will help. I understand your concern w.r.t getting the
correct set of patches with a good changelog.

> But I don't think it's worth the time and risk of a huge
> rip-up-and-refactor.
> 

I agree, given the proximity of the new merge window for 2.6.25.  We
could review the patches after folding them and see how to consolidate
further in case the patches continue to look messy.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists