linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] udf: remove wrong prototype of udf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071222090021.GA7872@joi>
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:00:28 +0100
From:	Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bfennema@...con.csc.calpoly.edu,
	jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] udf: remove wrong prototype of udf_readdir

On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 04:21:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:55:03 +0100
> Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > sparse generated:
> > fs/udf/dir.c:78:5: warning: symbol 'udf_readdir' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > there are 2 different prototypes of udf_readdir - remove them and move
> > code around to make it still compile
>
> Drat.  I just applied six udf patches from you and now we have a new patch
> series of only five with no indication what changed.
>
> I guess I really do need to apply my backlog in reverse time order.
I'm sorry for that. I added acked-by as Jan Kara suggested [1] and added better
description for 3rd patch. 6th patch was dropped [2] because it should be cleaned
up differently.

Marcin

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/20/151
[2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/201
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/