[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712232322.08946.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 23:22:08 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 17/20] non-reclaimable mlocked pages
On Saturday 22 December 2007 01:17, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:52:19 +1100
>
> Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> > BTW. if you have any workloads that are limited by page reclaim,
> > especially unmapped file backed pagecache reclaim, then I have some
> > stright-line-speedup patches which you might find interesting (I can
> > send them if you'd like to test).
>
> I am definately interested in those.
Sorry it took a few days...
So I'm testing throughput for the full pagecache lifecycle, insertion
to reclaim. Reading from a sparse file much bigger than memory.
On my 2 socket, 8 core Opteron setup:
Single dd from a single file:
vanilla: 687.01MB/s
patched: 1037.17MB/s (151%)
8 dds from a single file:
vanilla: 1458.04MB/s
patched: 5898.65MB/s (405%)
Not sure how well that translates to real world workloads, but it
might help somewhere. Admittedly some of the patches are pretty
complex...
Anyway, have a good christmas and new year :)
Thanks,
Nick
Download attachment "reclaim-speedups.tar.gz" of type "application/x-tgz" (19239 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists