linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: suspend broken on HP nx6325 due to cpufreq changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071223225616.GC20364@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:56:16 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...e.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: suspend broken on HP nx6325 due to cpufreq
	changes

On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:50:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

 > > > - Someone broke suspend-to-RAM on the t61p again.  It just instantly resumes
 > > >   itself.
 > > 
 > > Suspend is also broken on my HP nx6325 (hangs hard in the last phase of
 > > suspend) and git-cpufreq.patch is responsible for that (as shown by bisection).
 > > 
 > > Reverting git-cpufreq.patch makes suspend work again,
 > 
 > ah.  Thanks.

I'm not sure how this is 'new' breakage, because git-cpufreq hasn't changed
in a while, other than the integration of that missing #include diff
that sat in -mm.   Maybe some bad interaction with something else that
changed perhaps. *shrug*.

I'm on vacation until the new year, so I'm going out of my way not to look
at bugs for a change.  But I'm not ignoring this completely, I'll make a
note to look at it in January.
 
	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/