[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476DED9D.7070604@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:09:49 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Make MMCONFIG space (extended PCI config space) a driver
opt-in issue
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> But regardless of problems, enabling should be done globally, not per
>> device...
>
> I'm ok with trying the "globally" idea, but it has to be "globally but
> only if absolutely required".
>
> And quite frankly, how do you tell whether it's absolutely required or
> not?
>
> I have an idea: the drivers that really need it will do a "please enable
> MMCONFIG, because I will need it" thing?
>
> Ok?
>
> And then, since we *need* such a "pci_enable_mmconfig()" call anyway, why
> not let the driver give which device it controls too, so that we can print
> out the information (in case the machine then hangs immediately
> afterwards), and perhaps - if it is shown to help - only do the MMCONFIG
> cycles for that particular device?
>
> Sounds like a plan?
As long as pci_enable_ext_cfg_space(pdev) enables extended accesses for
-all- devices, the plan is mostly sound.
That largely eliminates the inconsistency issue.
The only thing I would worry about is whether "config space suddenly
grew larger" condition will confuse userspace -- but that is NOT an
objection, just a worry.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists