[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476DF8B2.2060608@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:57:06 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Make MMCONFIG space (extended PCI config space) a driver
opt-in issue
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> 2) It is legal for PCI-Express to put capabilities anywhere in PCI
> config space, including extended config space. (I hope our PCI cap
> walking code checks for overruns...)
>
Uh, not really. The classical capability format only has 8-bit
addresses, and the spec requires that all extended config space that is
used be claimed by extended capabilities -- a different format chain.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists