[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712241657080.23999@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:58:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/38] arch/x86/ia32: Use time_before, time_before_eq,
etc.
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >
> > The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
> > are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
>
> The old code was actually correct I think, but the change is ok for me.
Please ignore the patch. All of my before_eq and after_eq's are
backwards due to parsing <= as >= and vice versa. I will try again.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists