[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071224034530.GB16658@thunk.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:45:30 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 03:15:00PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Same here. In fact, I've always considered that procfs was for
> > humans while sysfs was for tools. sysfs reminds me too much the
> > unexploitable /devices in Solaris. With the proper tools, I think
> > we can do a lot with it, but it's not as intuitive to find the
> > proper tools as it was to do "ls" followed by "cat" in /proc.
>
> find /sys/... -type f | while read i ; do echo "$i: $(<$i)" ; done
>
> tends to work reasonably well for a quick overview, but yes
> cat was nicer for humans.
Until you start to wonder what the heck :a-0000136 is:
/sys/slab/:a-0000136/objs_per_slab: 30
Sigh...
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists