[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476F6047.50100@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:31:19 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Loic Prylli <loic@...i.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Make MMCONFIG space (extended PCI config space) a driver
opt-in issue
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> (For example: I have three machines that I know have working MMCONF. On
> only one of theose does Linux actually even enable MMCONF accesses,
> because on the two other ones the BIOSes do the crazy "put it in some
> space that is reserved by PnP crap later", so we actually refuse to touch
> it. So at least in my limited environment, we hardly get any MMCONFIG test
> coverage, exactly because we have to be so totally anal about not enabling
> it early, because we cannot guarantee that it's not clashing with anything
> else).
Definitely. So, two questions:
What's the preferred way to deal with the desire to view extended config
space with "lspci -vvvxxx"?
Right now, we enable mmconfig for the bus/domain range requested by the
BIOS [heh, so by implication many early BIOSen stomp themselves].
Is there a path for hw vendors, after passing 1,001 anal checks, to
maintain the current behavior as it exists today in
arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_{32,64}.c?
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists