[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1198689179.3317.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:12:59 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] sg_ring: convert core ATA code to sg_ring.
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 17:36 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (PS, I haven't followed the sg chaining discussion. Why is sg chaining
> an optional feature? Performance overhead on low end machines?)
The idea of SG chaining is to allow drivers that wish to take advantage
of it to increase their transfer lengths beyond
MAX_HW_SEGMENTS*PAGE_SIZE by using chaining. However, drivers that stay
below MAX_HW_SEGMENTS for the scatterlist length don't need to be
altered.
The ultimate goal (well, perhaps more wish) is to have all drivers
converted, so SCSI can use something small for the default scatterlist
sizing and dump all the sglist mempool stuff (although this may never be
reached).
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists