[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712262123.37152.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:23:37 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sleepy linux
Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2007 21:17:22 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> On Wed 2007-12-26 18:28:04, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2007 00:07:31 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > > Heute 00:07:31
> > >
> > > This is RFC. It does not even work for me... it sleeps but it will not
> > > wake up, because SATA wakeup code is missing. Code attached for illustration.
> > >
> > > I wonder if this is the right approach? What is right interface to the
> > > drivers?
> >
> > IMHO you are making to many special cases. The system can be "sleepy"
> > if all devices can be runtime suspended and all CPUs are idle.
>
> Is there an easy way to tell if all the devices are runtime suspended?
Do you really want to know whether they are suspended or whether they
could be suspended?
> I guess I need to know from atomic context :-(.
Urgh. suspend() must be able to sleep and can fail.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists