[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071227225947.GH27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:59:47 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: SLUB sysfs support
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 12:28:14PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Hmmm.. If I separately allocate the kobject then I can no longer get to
> the kmem_cache structure from the kobject.
>
> I need to add a second kobject_del to sysfs_slab_remove() to make sysfs
> completely forget about the object?
>
> Probably should track down any remaining symlinks at that point and nuke
> them too. Isnt there some way to convince sysfs to remove the symlinks
> if the target vanishes?
Don't bother with separate allocation.
a) remove symlink when slab goes away
b) instead of kfree() in slab removal do kobject_put() if you have sysfs stuff
c) have ->release() of these kobjects do kfree()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists