[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712271903.53961.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:03:52 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend ordering issue
Hi,
The following patchset is intended to fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend
ordering issue described at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528 and
in a recent LKML thread (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/25/37).
The patches actually do more than that, as I think it's reasonable to untangle
some ACPI-specific suspend code by the way. The details are described in the
changelogs.
The patches apply on top of the suspend branch of the ACPI tree
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 suspend),
but they are also included in the quilt patch series at:
http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.24-rc6/patches/ .
Please review (and test, if possible).
Thanks,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists