[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <11988745912862-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:42:47 -0500
From: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@....linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 13/30] Unionfs: prevent deadlock in cache coherency
Don't try to truncate_inode_pages in in purge_inode_data, because this could
lead to a deadlock between some of address_space ops and dentry
revalidation: the address space op is invoked with a lock on our own page,
and truncate_inode_pages will block on locked pages. Instead, it should be
enough to be gentler and just invalidate_mapping_pages.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index c7b6a7c..68c07ba 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
@@ -248,32 +248,22 @@ bool is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry)
}
/*
- * Purge/remove/unmap all date pages of a unionfs inode. This is called
- * when the lower inode has changed, and we have to force processes to get
- * the new data.
- *
- * XXX: Our implementation works in that as long as a user process will have
- * caused Unionfs to be called, directly or indirectly, even to just do
- * ->d_revalidate; then we will have purged the current Unionfs data and the
- * process will see the new data. For example, a process that continually
- * re-reads the same file's data will see the NEW data as soon as the lower
- * file had changed, upon the next read(2) syscall (even if the file is
- * still open!) However, this doesn't work when the process re-reads the
- * open file's data via mmap(2) (unless the user unmaps/closes the file and
- * remaps/reopens it). Once we respond to ->readpage(s), then the kernel
- * maps the page into the process's address space and there doesn't appear
- * to be a way to force the kernel to invalidate those pages/mappings, and
- * force the process to re-issue ->readpage. If there's a way to invalidate
- * active mappings and force a ->readpage, let us know please
- * (invalidate_inode_pages2 doesn't do the trick).
+ * Purge and invalidate as many data pages of a unionfs inode. This is
+ * called when the lower inode has changed, and we want to force processes
+ * to re-get the new data.
*/
static inline void purge_inode_data(struct inode *inode)
{
/* remove all non-private mappings */
unmap_mapping_range(inode->i_mapping, 0, 0, 0);
-
- if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
- truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
+ /* invalidate as many pages as possible */
+ invalidate_mapping_pages(inode->i_mapping, 0, -1);
+ /*
+ * Don't try to truncate_inode_pages here, because this could lead
+ * to a deadlock between some of address_space ops and dentry
+ * revalidation: the address space op is invoked with a lock on our
+ * own page, and truncate_inode_pages will block on locked pages.
+ */
}
void purge_sb_data(struct super_block *sb)
--
1.5.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists