[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071228032645.GM27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:26:45 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: SLUB sysfs support
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:19:46PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> nfsd4_delegations? What is this about?
The random lifetimes of user-visible files you create in sysfs.
> How do I scan for the symlinks in sysfs?
At which point are you going to do that? AFAICS, the fundamental problem
is that you
* have aliases indistinguishable, so kmem_cache_destroy() can't tell
which one is going away, no matter what
* have per-alias objects in sysfs
As the result, you have a user-visible mess in that directory in sysfs.
And I don't see how you would deal with that - on the "the contents of
directory changes in so-and-so way when such-and-such operation is
done", not the implementation details one.
BTW, I'm rather sceptical about free use of slabs; keep in mind that their
names have to be unique with your sysfs layout, so...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists