[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4774B30B.3080507@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:25:47 +0800
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fib6_del_route has redundant code
> From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:58:21 +0800
>
>>>> I think the following code in fib6_del_route in the latest kernel is useless.
>>>> 1125 if (fn->leaf == NULL && fn->fn_flags&RTN_TL_ROOT)
>>>> 1126 fn->leaf = &ip6_null_entry;
>>>>
>>>> ip6_null_entry will never be unlinked from fn->leaf now, that is,
>>>> fn->leaf == NULL will never meet.
>>> I think you are right, but if it is true the next block of
>>> code is dead too:
>>>
>>> /* If it was last route, expunge its radix tree node */
>>> if (fn->leaf == NULL) {
>>> fn->fn_flags &= ~RTN_RTINFO;
>>> rt6_stats.fib_route_nodes--;
>>> fn = fib6_repair_tree(fn);
>>> }
>>>
>> I think this block of code can't be removed, because just the
>> root(default route) fn->leaf always has ip6_null_entry on it. The
>> normal fn->leaf becomes NULL when last route has been deleted, the
>> radix tree should be expunged.
>
> But you said (still quoted above) that fn->leaf == NULL will not
> occur.
>
> Do you mean this, only in the case that the RTN_TL_ROOT flag is set?
yes, I mean this :-)
>
> I thought you meant always when the function is called, fn->leaf
> cannot ever be NULL.
its my fault, sorry for the inconvenient.
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists