[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071229095326.GD27360@does.not.exist>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:53:26 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: errandir_news@....eclipse.co.uk, m.kozlowski@...land.pl,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:18:02AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:06:19 +0200
>
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:54:08AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> > > Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:48:46 +0200
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:14:11AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > > > That's why I'm not worried about this issue and it's not critical at
> > > > > all.
> > > >
> > > > If a module calls sunserial_console_match() that's an Oops.
> > >
> > > That's true.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to figure out a way to fix this.
> >
> > #ifdef FOO_CONSOLE around the sunserial_console_match() calls in the
> > drivers should work.
>
> It absolutely doesn't work, I tried this, see my other reply.
>
> The issue is add_preferred_console() is __init, driver probe calls are
> __devinit which are either __init or not __init.
>
> So even with the FOO_CONSOLE ifdef (or something similar like the
> patch I posted) we'll still get section mismatch warnings.
>...
Sorry, I shouldn't suggest stuff I haven't tried myself... :-(
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists