[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8e1da0712281803i11c04b37ic5e92a4c27c79b07@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:03:31 +0800
From: "Dave Young" <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Use mutex instead of semaphore in driver core
>From your previous mail
>You need to actually boot the kernel to get effective reports from
>lockdep, it'll build just fine.
I will post the config file and dmesg with lockdep messages after a while.
On Dec 29, 2007 9:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 09:52 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> > Hm, actually it's not so hard, but If I resend the 12 patches seems
> > like spam to lkml :-).
> >
> > Of cource, if you all don't mind and it is really needed, I will do that.
>
> As it stands now I'm quite convinced these patches will make lockdep
> scream bloody murder, so these patches would need quite some more work
> before they're usable.
>
> > >
> > > Also, I don't think your series is bisectable, ie. 1/12 changes
> > > device::sem -> device::mutex, and 12/12 changes a user of it.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't use git tools now. Could you tell me how to fix it?
> > thanks in advance.
>
> Just ensure that the kernel builds after each applied patch. If you're
> using quilt, something like:
>
> while (quilt push && make)
> should finish the whole series.
>
Thanks a lot.
Regards
dave
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists