linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:14:11 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bunk@...nel.org
Cc:	errandir_news@....eclipse.co.uk, m.kozlowski@...land.pl,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1: some section mismatches on sparc64

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 01:22:56 +0200

> At least the sunserial_console_match() one is an obvious Oops 
> (EXPORT_SYMBOL of an __init function).
> 
> The comment in the description of
> commit 58d784a5c754cd66ecd4791222162504d3c16c74 the warning was bogus    
> is bullshit.
> 
> I'm not sure whether this might count as a 2.6.24-rc regression or 
> whether 2.6.23 is simply differently but similarly broken (does anyone 
> actually use the Sun console drivers modular?).

You can't do that, the FOO_CONSOLE config options depend upon
FOO=y.

That's why I'm not worried about this issue and it's not critical at
all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/