linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix crash with FLAT_MEMORY and ARCH_PFN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071230113713.GA9434@alpha.franken.de>
Date:	Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:37:13 +0100
From:	tsbogend@...ha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer)
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bob Picco <bob.picco@...com>,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Keith Mannthey <kmannth@...il.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix crash with FLAT_MEMORY and ARCH_PFN_OFFSET != 0

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 01:27:20PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On (20/12/07 13:43), Thomas Bogendoerfer didst pronounce:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:44:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > --- a/include/asm-mips/page.h
> > > +++ b/include/asm-mips/page.h
> > > @@ -37,13 +37,6 @@
> > >  #include <linux/pfn.h>
> > >  #include <asm/io.h>
> > >  
> > > -/*
> > > - * It's normally defined only for FLATMEM config but it's
> > > - * used in our early mem init code for all memory models.
> > > - * So always define it.
> > > - */
> > > -#define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET		PFN_UP(PHYS_OFFSET)
> > > -
> > 
> > hmm, doesn't this break what I've fixed ? Without this #define
> > ARCH_PFN_OFFSET gets defined to 0 and the bug is back. Or did
> > I miss anything ?
> > 
> 
> ARCH_PFN_OFFSET goes to 0, so page_to_pfn() is no longer adjusting by
> PFN_UP(PHYS_OFFSET) like it was when your problem occured. I am guessing
> that the nature of the crash was that page_to_pfn() was returning bogus
> values early in boot and trying to initialise memmap that didn't exist.

ic, your patch works for me.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/