[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712301554430.8187@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:55:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/38] arch/x86/ia32: Use time_before, time_before_eq,
etc.
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > > >
> > > > The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
> > > > are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
> > >
> > > The old code was actually correct I think, but the change is ok for me.
> >
> > Please ignore the patch. All of my before_eq and after_eq's are
> > backwards due to parsing <= as >= and vice versa. I will try again.
>
> your x86 patches (#7, #8 and #9) do not include any *_eq() comparisons
> and they all seem to be correct. So picked those three up into x86.git -
> let me know if there's any breakage in them that i missed.
Only #7 is ok. The other two have #include <jiffies.h> in the wrong
place. I will send new versions of #8 and #9 shortly.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists