[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071230150602.GU16946@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:06:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH - RFC] x86: unify arch/x86/kernel/Makefile(s)
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > Combine the 32 and 64 bit specific Makefiles in one file. While
> > doing so link order was (almost) preserved on 32 bit but on 64 bit
> > link order changed a lot.
> >
> > Patch was checked with defconfig + allyesconfig builds. The same .o
> > files were linked in these configurations.
> >
> > To keep readability of the Makefiles a few Kconfig symbols was
> > added/modified and it was checked that they were not used anywhere
> > else.
>
> hm, i agree with this change, but would it be possible to split this
> up into gradual steps, to change the rules on 64-bit one by one? That
> would make it much more bisectable. In our experience changes to the
> link order have a high likelyhood of breaking stuff, as we've got so
> many implicit initcall dependencies that are not explicitly spelled
> out.
i've added your full patch meanwhile - maybe we can get away with it.
Still, if you see any easy way to do a straightforward series of ~40
patches that changes one link rule per patch then that would be great
and we could add them as an easier-to-bisect replacement for this one
large-scope patch.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists