linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4777E010.7030703@keyaccess.nl>
Date:	Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:14:40 +0100
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	dpreed@...d.com, Islam Amer <pharon@...il.com>, hpa@...or.com,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override

On 30-12-07 17:48, Alan Cox wrote:

> For processors with TSC I think we should aim for 2.6.25 to do this and 
> to have the major other _p fixups done. I pity whoever does stuff like 
> the scc drivers but most of the rest isn't too bad.

I'm by the way looking at drivers/net/wd.c which my 386 uses for its dual 
mode NE2000/WD8013 clone ISA NIC and while it specifically needs no delay at 
all it seems, the mixed use of out and outb_p seems to suggest that someone 
once thought about that. Would you advice sticking in a udelay(2) manually 
there?

Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/